#Nyt best reads 2017 full
#Nyt best reads 2017 trial

Alex Tabak Former editorial page editor James Bennet (right) arrives for the trial in Sarah Palin’s defamation lawsuit against the New York Times, at the United States Courthouse in New York on January 24, 2022.

Sarah Palin arrives at US federal court for the first day of her defamation suit against the New York Times on February 3, 2022. The editorial was corrected hours after it was published. The editorial suggested a map distributed by Palin’s political action committee that featured stylized crosshairs over congressional districts, including Gifford’s, contributed to the shooting.

That’s what the evidence here will show,” Vogt told jurors, suggesting the editorial pushed a false, GOP-bashing narrative instead of being properly fact checked. Palin’s lawyer, Shane Vogt, argued that the Times and then-editorial page editor James Bennet acted with reckless disregard for the facts by linking Palin with the shooting. The former GOP vice presidential candidate alleged in her suit that a 2017 editorial printed by the Grey Lady linked her political action committee to a mass shooting in Arizona that wounded Rep. Opening statements in the civil case moved forward in Manhattan federal court after being delayed for more than a week after Palin tested positive for COVID-19 last Monday. Sarah Palin’s defamation trial against the New York Times kicked off in Manhattan Thursday with the former Alaska governor’s lawyer claiming “facts didn’t matter” to the paper when it published an editorial linking her to a mass shooting. Sarah Palin tests positive for COVID, delays defamation trial against NYT Sarah Palin dines outside at Manhattan restaurant after testing positive for COVID-19 Sarah Palin’s birth chart shows men she is romantically compatible with

It’s the concepts and associated illustrations that stick, and the most efficient way to understand and remember them is typically not reading a book.NYT editors ignored fact checkers before publishing editorial linking Palin to shooting: emails But that’s about it, even if I took a lot of notes or wrote a review. If you asked me to summarise a book I read 10-years ago, I can typically recall the main concepts and an example or two. Academic articles or web material are often better sources. I’ll read as much as I need to, which is often only a small portion, in which case the book doesn’t make this list. Now, I’m more likely picking up a non-fiction book to learn something specific. My previous rationale for reading a book was typically to hear someone’s thoughts and arguments on a topic that might be interesting. Second, and what I expect will prevent a rebound in the number of books I complete, is that my approach to reading has changed in the last couple of years. From July to November inclusive, I completed two non-fiction books. Most of the teaching involved designing the units from scratch.

#Nyt best reads 2017 full

I’ve left a lot of fiction read to the kids off this list – the Harry Potter series (multiple times), the full Wizard of Oz series, the Deltora Quest series, Enid Blyton, and so on – but the decline in substantive reading was driven by other factors.įirst, I took on a heavy teaching load in the second half of the year – teaching post-graduate economics and behavioural economics units – on top of the day job. The number of books fell yet again relative to the previous year, with 37 books (21 non-fiction, 16 fiction). Judea Pearl, The Book of Why: I’m still working through Pearl’s approach and how it relates to other approaches to causation, but this is possibly the best starting point on Pearl’s work.īelow is the list of books that I read in 2020 (starred if a re-read). The story being told around the time of my PhD has been blown apart. Melanie Mitchell, Artificial Intelligence, A Guide for Thinking Humans: Mitchell is too easy on humans, but a fair examination of where we are with AI and some great explanations of various AI approaches.ĭavid Reich, Who We Are and How We Got Here: I was amazed at how far over the last decade the research into human origins had shifted. Tom Chivers, The AI Does Not Hate You: Superintelligence, Rationality and the Race to Save the World: Great introduction to and history of the rationalist community. The best books I read in 2020 – generally released in other years – were: